How successful has the government’s 10-year school rebuilding programme been?  There are 100 school rebuilding projects currently underway, with a third set of 61 schools announced in July, so:

❓ Has it created an effective digital infrastructure?

❓What would/should the direction of government policy on school building and refurbishment under new political leadership?

❓What effect has it had, if any, on pedagogy?

With questions such as these, how do you assess the ongoing rollout and implementation? We’re pleased to be involved in the Westminster Forum Projects ‘Next steps for school buildings in England’ online conference tomorrow where delegates will do just that!

I’ll be speaking on understanding and maximising the benefits of improved facilities on educational outcomes.

The speakers and delegates will also look at issues around support for schools that have not been accepted onto the programme; how can their needs be met?

Chaired by former Minister for Schools & Learners, Rt Hon Lord Knight of Weymouth, there are some great keynote sessions from Jane Balderstone and Rory Kennedy from the Department for Education; Robert Gould, Partner at Barker Associates, and Associate Director Matt Robertson of LocatED. The conference will examine the future of school buildings and the development of the schools estate in England – including improvement of estate quality, the school buildings market, and maximising the benefits of improved facilities.

The agenda looks at:

• improving the quality of the schools estate in England – key priorities moving forward – effective digital infrastructure – developing facilities fit for the long term
• the school rebuilding programme – policy priorities – rollout – lessons learnt so far
• the current school buildings market – strategies for land acquisition
• environmental sustainability and energy efficiency – school buildings for the future – role in contributing to net-zero – cost of running school buildings amid rising energy prices
• benefits of improved facilities – impact on educational outcomes – teaching quality – maximising community use

More info and booking details can be found here.

It should be a thought-provoking day with lots of opportunities for discussion, we’re looking forward to it 😊

“It saves you time.”

This is something that is often said about MIS, but what does it mean? More importantly, how effective do schools feel their MIS actually is at saving them time?

A recent survey¹ of 2,146 schools asked, amongst other things, how effective they felt their MIS is at saving them time. The overall results are outlined in the pie chart below:

As you can see, the majority of respondents (just over a third at 38.85%) went for the middle ground and said it was ‘Somewhat effective’. That said, a combined total of 43% did say they felt it was either Very or Extremely effective which is good news for suppliers as it indicates users must be feeling some time-saving benefits from their solutions.

We can also break this down further by MIS; the chart below shows survey results for the ‘Big 5’ (who, between them, they make up 96% of school market share²):

But what does the idea of ‘saving time’ actually mean when it comes to systems and users? There are a number of ways of defining it, here are just a few:

1. The MIS literally takes a basic, manual process and uses software to make it easier. A good example of this would be the school census; it has to be done in a certain timeframe, it’s very data-heavy, and the role of MIS in this is to make it as automated as possible, therefore saving time.

2. The MIS brings an automated element to improve a process and create a more complete view. A good example of this is the ability to record and manage behaviour within MIS; it’s something that all schools have (and use things such as paper report cards in secondary) but, once they start to utilise their MIS for this, the increased shared knowledge means teachers have the info at their fingertips and don’t need to waste time searching for it.

3. The MIS completely replaces the way something has always been done to make it easier and slicker. For example, communicating with parents used to be via letters and reports. MIS’ offer the ability to email, text and direct message via apps, plus parent portals. Another good example is the handling of money; everything from school dinner management to online trip payments can now be done online, completely replacing the original processes and saving time.

4. The MIS provides insight that would otherwise have been time-consuming to find out. A good example of this is analytics and dashboards which draw on data from a number of sources to help leaders ask questions, and also provide answers.

5. The MIS suggests courses of action based on data. This is something we have yet to see in use in a big way, but the idea is that your MIS can make some suggestions to you using machine learning based on a combination of what it has seen work in the past, plus your usual actions. Think about when you shop online at Amazon, the site makes suggestions for other products based on your purchases and what other customers go on to buy. A school-based example could be that various intervention suggestions are made when behaviour incidents are recorded, and these could be based on past actions combined with, say, the MATs own intervention policy. The time savings here could be enormous – as well as getting a strategy in place sooner to help the child.

So there are definitely ways MIS solutions can save time, it’s really a matter of understanding how.

As an MIS supplier, saying you “save schools time” isn’t a meaningful statement anymore that sets you apart from the competition. It’s a given that a solution will do that; your unique value proposition should focus on how it will do it, why it’s important, and what benefits the school will get as a result.

¹The data was collected by The Key from a survey that went out to all primary, secondary, special schools and pupil referral units in England, by email. It was not sent to independent schools. The survey was completed by Headteachers, Deputy and Assistant Heads, and School Business Managers / Leaders between 29 March and 27 April 2021.

As part of the survey, respondents were asked which MIS they use. The results are outlined below:

²Market share statistics are sourced from two excellent, independent blogs: Graham Reed’s Omega Pegasus and Josh Perry’s Bring More Data 

Almost all of the work I’m doing with businesses at the moment centres around the value proposition and, specifically, how to create a good one.  So I thought it was about time I blogged about it as it’s something which is so important but which so many people get wrong.

Put simply, the value proposition is a clear statement of the value your product will deliver and will be the main reason your potential client will buy from you.  It’s not a description of how good your product is, nor is it about how many clients you have, how many awards you’ve won or how much your customers like you.  The value proposition is about the customer, not you.

The value proposition should:

• Explain how your product solves customers’ problems or improves their situation
• Explain how you will deliver specific benefits
• Explain to the ideal customer why they should buy from you and not from the competition

Ideally the value proposition should be snappy and be the main focus of all engagement material, from the website through to marketing literature.  Easy peasy eh??!

Well no, it’s not.  Getting the value proposition right involves knowing exactly what your product can do compared to the competitors out there and understanding what it is that your potential clients need.  You then have to take all this info and formulate it into a proposition that highlights your uniqueness in the market and creates something your customers actually care about.  So no, it’s not easy but, when you see how customers respond, you’ll see it’s well worth the effort.